Secondary copper production up 6% in Q1 2018

Worldwide refined copper production is estimated to have increased by 3% in the first quarter of 2018, according to new figures released by the International Copper Study Group. It says that secondary copper production surged by 6% while primary production grew 2.3% in this period.

Total production at copper mines averaged approximately 330 000 tonnes in the first quarter of the year. This is largely due to the fact that production in Chile, the world’s biggest copper producer, increased by almost 20%. Copper output at Indonesian mines was up by a remarkable 58%.

On a regional basis, mine production is estimated to have increased by around 11% in Africa, 7% in the Americas, 6% in Asia, 4% in Europe and 5% in Oceania.

‘Although no major supply disruptions occurred in the first quarter of this year, overall growth was partially offset by lower output at some mines in Canada (-10%) and in the United States (-7.5%),’ market analysts observe.

China was the biggest contributor to growth with usage increasing by around 5%. This was driven by a 10% increase in net refined copper imports. Usage in the rest of the world fell by about 1%.

The global refined copper balance for the first quarter of 2018 indicates a surplus of about 150 000 tonnes.

Bankers Have Gone AWOL in the Race to Build More Lithium Mines

After clinching a deal with a Chinese battery maker in 2016, James Brown figured bankers would be eager to fund his new lithium mine. Altura Mining Ltd. was racing to ship the raw material from Australia to the world’s biggest electric vehicle market as demand was surging.

Instead, while lithium prices kept rising, Brown spent a Christmas holiday cold-calling lenders and jetted around the globe to raise the money. Eventually, Minneapolis-based Castlelake LP, a private equity firm, helped arrange $110 million in bonds. But there was a catch: an interest rate as high as 15 percent, or almost double what banks normally charge for more conventional mining ventures.

“We’d been trying banks we’d known for years,” said Brown, Altura’s managing director, who previously spent 22 years with coal producer New Hope Corp. “They said: Guys we love it, we just don’t have a mandate (for lithium). If you came to us with coal, gold or iron ore, you’d have no worries.”

Despite bullish forecasts for global demand — especially with accelerating production of electric vehicles — lithium may have a funding problem. Banks are wary, citing everything from the industry’s poor track record on delivering earlier projects to a lack of insight into a small, opaque market. Without more investment, supplies of the commodity could remain tight, sustaining a boom that already has seen prices triple since 2015.

Lithium companies will need to invest about $12 billion to increase output fivefold by 2025 and keep pace with the world’s growing appetite for batteries, according to Galaxy Resources Ltd., an Australian producer seeking to build further operations in Argentina and Canada. Developers say that, so far, projects aren’t getting financed fast enough to achieve that leap.

Battery producers and automakers “have absolutely no clue on how long it takes to be able to put a mining project into operation,” said Guy Bourassa, chief executive officer of Nemaska Lithium Inc., which spent about 18 months piecing together a complex C$1.1 billion ($830 million) funding program for a mine and processing plant in Quebec. “There will be a big problem — it’s going to be an impediment” to raising supply, he said.

An “inability to access traditional funds has delayed the development of the sector,” said Richard Seville, CEO of Brisbane-based Orocobre Ltd., which began lithium sales in 2015 from northern Argentina, and experienced difficulty boosting output. “These projects aren’t easy — so the banks just don’t want to go there.”

Part of the problem is that lenders remain cautious of the risk of another commodity slump, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the nation’s largest bank, said in an August presentation. It declined to comment specifically on the lithium market.

While the amount of debt raised by miners, including loans and bonds, rose in 2017 to about $255 billion, project-specific financing of about $13 billion last year is more than 70 percent lower than in 2014, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. So far this year, about $6.1 billion in total has been issued for projects.

Some new deposits are being developed in riskier emerging markets or countries on the edge of investment-grade credit ratings, such as Argentina, according to Lee Garvey at Marsh & McLennan Cos., an insurance broker that has seen an increase in requests for polices related to lithium projects.

“With lithium, there is the added complexity that there is not much clarity around the end product and what the royalty should be,” Garvey said from Singapore, where he’s head of Marsh’s lenders solutions group, political risks and structured credit in Asia. “This probably makes the whole thing more challenging, particularly in frontier markets.”

There’s also concern about pricing. Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. has no project finance exposure to lithium. It’s considering opportunities on “a very selective basis given the uncertainty over future prices, exacerbated by the opaque nature of the market, the inability to hedge and forecast oversupply in the medium term, and the small scale of some of the local players,” the bank said in a statement.

Developers of some lithium projects declined in Tuesday trading in Sydney. Lithium Australia NL fell 5.1 percent, Global Geoscience Ltd. traded 5.3 percent lower and Kidman Resources Ltd. slipped 3.7 percent.

It typically takes two years to build a lithium operation and five years to repay the project loan, according to Simon Price, a partner and co-founder at Perth-based Azure Capital Ltd., which has advised miners on financing. That means lenders need confidence in a seven-year outlook for the market, he said.

That price outlook is an industry flash-point. Morgan Stanley says there will be a surplus as soon as next year because of rising output and forecasts lithium carbonate prices to halve through 2021, according to a note. Citigroup Inc. also expects prices to decline as production increases.

But boosting supplies may not be easy. By 2020, it’s possible that only a third of planned new capacity will be available at the processing plants needed to convert mined raw materials into battery chemicals, Orocobre says. Lithium demand is also being underestimated, according to Pilbara Minerals Ltd., a producer starting a mine in Australia.

Some alternative funding sources for lithium have emerged, including hedge funds offering higher-yield debt or credit funds formed to lend to projects. They’re more expensive, but “you build your project and you are in business now when the market is very strong,” Price said. The sector’s biggest players are readying an IPO blitz, in part to fund expansions.

Lithium users also are stepping in with funding. Posco, the South Korean steelmaker that’s ramping up its battery-making business, and Great Wall Motor Co., China’s top SUV producer, have both invested in Pilbara Minerals to speed up project development. Tesla Inc. in May signed a supply deal with Kidman, a boon for the Australian developer as it seeks to finance a mine and plant.

Supply deals and investments with end customers mean lithium projects are being financed differently from traditional commodities, according to Westpac Institutional Bank, a unit of Australia’s second-biggest lender.

Some banks are lending. Perth-based Galaxy last year secured a $40 million general purpose debt facility with BNP Paribas SA. BNP declined to comment on its stance on lithium projects. As new developments begin output, banks will be more willing to refinance loans, according to Azure’s Price. Altura will seek to replace existing debt as soon as August, says Brown.

Still, electrifying the world’s vehicle fleet will require vast sums for new mines, and funding will remain a challenge for smaller companies, according to Nemaska’s Bourassa.

Volkswagen AG alone plans to spend about 50 billion euros ($58 billion) on batteries as it seeks to build electric versions of 300 models. “Imagine how many tons of lithium salts it takes to make those batteries,” Bourassa said.

Gold and copper futures sink to 2018 lows

Gold futures settled sharply lower Monday as the dollar gained to start a new quarter of trading, keeping precious metals prices pinned at 2018 lows.

Meanwhile, platinum futures marked their lowest settlement since late 2008 and copper prices finished at their lowest since September against a backdrop of global trade concerns.

August gold GCQ8, +0.36% lost $12.80, or 1%, to settle at $1,241.70 an ounce, proving Friday’s small rally to be fleeting as the metal remains in a downtrend. Gold settled at the lowest for a most-active contract since Dec. 21, according to FactSet data.

Gold prices had logged a weekly loss of 1.3% through Friday, as well as a 3.8% June decline and a 5.5% drop for the quarter, leaving prices down more than 4% so far in 2018.

“The excuse for gold being down so much starts with the dollar, but I suspect there are some gold bulls throwing in the towel, which may be exacerbating gold’s weakness,” said Michael Armbruster, managing partner at Altavest.

Even so, he said he “would not be surprised to see a big gold rally in the near future”—possibly a gain of $50 an ounce. “The best way to speculate on such a move would be to buy long gold calls. At the moment gold is a falling knife, so options may be the best way to play the long side and still keep plenty of powder dry.”

The most popular exchange-traded fund that tracks gold, the SPDR Gold Trust GLD, +0.38% shed 0.9% Monday. It dropped 3.5% in June, greatly expanding what is now a 4% year-to-date retreat.

As gold fell, the ICE U.S. Dollar Index DXY, -0.21% was up 0.5% at 95.075, up over 3% so far this year.

Interest-rate expectations, and with them, a higher dollar, have almost exclusively accounted for gold’s retreat. Higher rates dull the appeal of nonyielding bullion, while a firmer dollar makes the gold priced in the U.S. unit less appealing to investors using another currency.

Dollar-pegged gold has also decidedly turned lower even as uncertainty over global growth and anxieties about escalating trade tensions—factors that would typically provide a lift for the commodity—have intensified, weighing on prices for industrial metals.

President Trump on Sunday said he sees his threat to impose global auto tariffs as his biggest weapon to extract concessions from trading partners.

Against that backdrop, platinum took the biggest hit among major Comex metals. October platinum PLV8, +1.30% dropped 5.2% to $813.40 an ounce. FactSet data show that as the lowest most-active contract settlement since December 2008.

Auto companies have been talking about the potential for a Trump-tariff fueled slowdown—and that is “killing the catalytic converter market potential” for platinum, said Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at Price Futures Group.

Added to that, adding that “big-name motor manufacturers” keep announcing new electric vehicle models, said Adrian Ash, director of research at BullionVault, which continues to “whack the price of platinum.”

September copper HGU8, +0.58% also fell 0.7% to $2.944 a pound. The settlement was the lowest for a most-active contract since late September 2017, FactSet data show.

Prices of the metal used widely in construction applications have tumbled 10% since June 7. China accounts for nearly half of global copper consumption estimated this year at around 24 million metric tons.

“The trade dispute with the U.S. appears to have put pressure on Chinese companies even ahead of the U.S. import tariffs,” said Carsten Fritsch, commodities analyst with Commerzbank, in a note.

Meanwhile, a Financial Times report on Sunday said the European Union has threatened $300 billion in fresh tariffs against U.S. products if Trump follows through on his threatened 20% levies targeting the trade bloc’s auto makers. And Canadian retaliatory tariffs took effect Sunday, with those measures serving as a response to U.S. metals tariffs.

Other metals traded on Comex saw broad losses, with September silver SIU8, +0.98% down 2.2% at $15.835 an ounce, marking the lowest finish since mid-December. The most popular exchange-traded fund that tracks silver, the iShares Silver Trust SLV, -1.58% fell 1.6%. September palladium PAU8, +0.35% shed 1.7% to $934.40 an ounce.

Copper hits 7-month low as U.S., China trade tensions rumble

Copper prices hit seven-month lows on Monday as the market priced in weaker demand in top consumer China, which is embroiled in the trade spat with the United States even as its manufacturing sector slows.

Benchmark copper ended down 1.6 percent at $6,523 a tonne from an earlier $6,519, its lowest since Dec. 5. Prices of the metal used widely in power and construction have tumbled more than 10 percent since June 7.

“Investors are taking risk off the table because of trade tensions, which threaten Chinese exports to the United States and also their profit margins,” said SP Angel analyst John Meyer. “Industrial metals rely on China.”

TRADE: U.S. President Donald Trump has this year sought to renegotiate some of the United States’ trading relationships, in particular with China. He has imposed tariffs on some imports, in turn sparking retaliatory action by other countries, raising fears of a global trade war.

ODDS: “For now, we remain of the view that a large scale “trade war” remains a low probability, though the odds of it happening have clearly increased,” JPMorgan analysts said in a note. “Acknowledging the rising trade risks, we have no exposure to the base metals complex.”

SHORTS: Marex position estimates show short copper positions across COMEX, Shanghai Futures Exchange and the LME.

Short positions on the LME totalled 6.9 percent of open interest on the LME – 11,600 lots or 290,000 tonnes – at close of business on June 28, the largest short since Sept. 16.

COPPER: China accounts for nearly half of global copper consumption estimated this year at around 24 million tonnes.

MANUFACTURING: Growth in China’s manufacturing sector cooled slightly in June as firms faced rising input costs and a decline in export orders amid an escalating trade dispute with the United States, a private survey showed.

DOLLAR: A stronger U.S. currency also weighed on industrial metals as it makes dollar-denominated commodities more expensive for non-U.S. firms.

CHINA MONEY: Monetary easing in China is expected to help support industrial metals.

China’s central bank in April unexpectedly cut reserve requirement ratios (RRR) for most banks, in a move that was earlier and more aggressive than expected, highlighting concerns over liquidity.

Many analysts expect further RRR cuts in coming months as China’s economic growth starts to cool under pressure from rising borrowing costs and a regulatory crackdown on riskier lending practices.

PRICES: Aluminium fell 1.6 percent to $2,098 a tonne, zinc was down 1.1 percent to $2,822 a tonne, lead slid one percent to $2,386 a tonne, tin was unchanged at $19,750 a tonne and nickel lost 2.3 percent to $14,550 a tonne.

error: Content is protected !!