Web Analytics
MARKETS
S&P 500 7,807.24−4.30 · −0.06%
Albemarle 98.51−2.76 · −2.73%
SQM 62.47−1.44 · −2.25%
Lithium ETF 68.37−1.36 · −1.95%
Lithium Americas 2.25−0.10 · −4.26%
Pilbara 3.08−0.29 · −8.61%
Battery Metals

Washington's $450 Million Tungsten Bet Meets a B.C. Drill Hole

A US$450 million federal commitment to The Elmet Group has junior explorers pointing at their own tungsten ground. GoldHaven has drilled 800-plus metres at Kuhn in B.C., with assays still to come.

Carl Bergman 7 min read
Person in winter coat approaches red truck on snowy field under overcast skies.

GoldHaven Resources Corp. said a US$450 million U.S. government investment in The Elmet Group to expand domestic tungsten capacity underscores the strategic value of its Kuhn tungsten project in northern British Columbia, where more than 800 metres have been drilled and assays are pending.

A US$450 million U.S. government investment in The Elmet Group, aimed at expanding domestic tungsten capacity and securing America's tungsten supply chain, has given the small end of the exploration market something it rarely gets: a dollar figure attached to a metal most investors cannot price from memory. GoldHaven Resources Corp. moved quickly to connect that announcement to its own work, pointing to more than 800 metres of drilling completed at the historic Kuhn tungsten system in northern British Columbia, where assays are still pending.

"Tungsten is increasingly recognized as one of the world's most strategically important critical minerals," said Rob Birmingham, President and CEO of GoldHaven, in the company's statement carried by INN Precious Metals.

Why tungsten attracts federal money

Tungsten is the hardest of the common industrial metals to substitute. It goes into cutting tools, armour and armour-penetrating projectiles, aerospace components, drilling equipment and high-temperature alloys — applications where the metal's density and melting point are the entire point of using it. There is no drop-in replacement for tungsten carbide in machining, which means a shortfall in supply is felt across defence and advanced manufacturing simultaneously rather than in one end market at a time.

That is the logic behind the US$450 million commitment to The Elmet Group. The money is directed at domestic capacity — the processing and manufacturing stage — rather than at mining alone. That distinction matters for how explorers should read it. Building downstream capacity creates a buyer inside the United States that did not previously exist at that scale, and buyers eventually need feed. But the investment does not, by itself, contract any particular deposit, and it does not shorten the decade-long path from a drill hole to a producing mine.

What GoldHaven actually has at Kuhn

The company's disclosure is specific about the stage of the work, which is a point in its favour. More than 800 metres have been drilled at Kuhn. Broad skarn intervals were encountered, including approximately 20 metres of skarn in the second drill hole. Assays are pending.

Skarn is the geological setting that hosts many of the world's tungsten deposits: a zone of altered carbonate rock formed where an intrusion cooks the surrounding limestone and swaps chemistry with it. Hitting broad skarn tells a geologist the plumbing system is present and the drill is in the right rock. It does not tell anyone how much tungsten is in that rock. Only the laboratory does that, and the laboratory has not reported yet.

The historical numbers give some shape to expectations. Earlier drilling at Kuhn returned 13.0 metres grading 0.55% WO₃ and 11.3 metres grading 0.59% WO₃ with 0.10% MoS₂ — WO₃ being tungsten trioxide, the standard unit for reporting tungsten grade, and MoS₂ being molybdenite, a potential by-product credit. A historical estimate put roughly 616,500 tonnes at 0.48% WO₃ across four modelled lenses.

The caveat that goes with historical estimates

Historical estimates are exactly that. They were produced under earlier reporting conventions, a qualified person has not done the work needed to classify them as current mineral resources under today's Canadian standards, and the company is not treating them as current. They are a guide to where to point the rig, not a statement of what is in the ground now. Any investor treating the 616,500-tonne figure as a resource is reading it wrong. The point of the current 800-plus-metre programme is precisely to begin replacing historical work with modern, verifiable data.

Does federal spending reach a junior explorer?

They are a guide to where to point the rig, not a statement of what is in the ground now.

The honest answer is: indirectly, slowly, and only if the rock cooperates. A US$450 million capacity investment reshapes sentiment across the tungsten space almost immediately — it validates the thesis that Western governments intend to pay to reduce dependence on concentrated foreign supply, and that validation flows into how the market prices exploration stories. That is the channel GoldHaven is invoking, and it is a real one.

The slower channel is commercial. Domestic processing capacity eventually needs domestic or allied concentrate. Northern British Columbia sits inside an allied jurisdiction with established mining law, road access in many districts, and a permitting system that, while not fast, is at least predictable. A project that survives drilling, metallurgy, permitting and financing could find a customer that a decade ago would have looked offshore by default. None of those steps is guaranteed at Kuhn, and none of them has been completed.

What separates a credible junior from a headline-chaser in this cycle is whether the drilling is real, whether the grades are reported in full rather than selectively, and whether historical figures are clearly flagged as historical. On the disclosure itself, GoldHaven has been explicit that assays are outstanding — which is the correct posture when the results are not yet in hand.

What to watch from here

The next hard datapoint is the assay release from the current programme. Three things will matter in it: whether the broad skarn intervals carry tungsten grades in the range the historical holes suggest, how continuous the mineralisation is between the modelled lenses, and whether molybdenum shows up at levels that could support a by-product credit. Widths without grade would be a disappointment; narrow high-grade would be a different project than the historical estimate implies.

Beyond the company, the tungsten market itself is the variable few retail investors track. Prices are set in a thin, opaque market dominated by Chinese supply, and the direction of that market — not federal press releases — ultimately determines whether a 0.48% WO₃ deposit is economic. Watch also for whether The Elmet Group investment is followed by further federal commitments further upstream, toward mining and concentrate supply rather than processing. That would be the signal that Washington intends to fund the whole chain rather than the last link in it.

The broader tape offered little context for a story like this one. The S&P 500 tracker closed at $762.60, up 1.13% on the day, with the Nasdaq 100 proxy at $716.92 and the Dow tracker at $518.35, as of the last trade on Thursday, 17 September 2026. Critical-minerals juniors trade on their own news flow, and for GoldHaven that news flow now runs through a laboratory.

Key facts

  • U.S. government investment: US$450 million in The Elmet Group to expand domestic tungsten capacity
  • Drilling completed at Kuhn: More than 800 metres; approx. 20 metres of skarn in second hole; assays pending
  • Historical drill results: 13.0 m at 0.55% WO₃; 11.3 m at 0.59% WO₃ with 0.10% MoS₂ (historical, not current)
  • Historical estimate: ~616,500 tonnes grading 0.48% WO₃ across four modelled lenses

Frequently asked questions

What did the U.S. government actually fund?

The announcement covers a US$450 million U.S. government investment in The Elmet Group, directed at expanding domestic tungsten capacity and securing America's tungsten supply chain. It targets processing and manufacturing capability inside the United States rather than a specific mine, so it does not by itself commit to buying material from any named deposit or explorer.

What has GoldHaven drilled at Kuhn?

GoldHaven has completed more than 800 metres of drilling at the historic Kuhn tungsten system in northern British Columbia. The programme encountered broad skarn intervals, including approximately 20 metres of skarn in the second drill hole. Assays from that drilling are pending, so the tungsten grades within those intervals are not yet known.

Why is tungsten considered strategically important?

Tungsten has an extremely high melting point and density, and is essential to cutting tools, armour and penetrators, aerospace parts, drilling equipment and high-temperature alloys. There is no practical substitute for tungsten carbide in machining, so any supply disruption hits defence and advanced manufacturing at the same time — which is why governments treat it as a critical mineral.

What does WO₃ mean in the grades reported?

WO₃ is tungsten trioxide, the standard chemical form used to report tungsten grade in ore. A grade of 0.48% WO₃ means that proportion of the rock, by weight, is tungsten trioxide. MoS₂, which appeared at 0.10% in one historical interval, is molybdenite — a molybdenum mineral that can provide a by-product credit alongside tungsten.

Can the historical estimate be treated as a mineral resource?

No. The approximately 616,500 tonnes grading 0.48% WO₃ across four modelled lenses is described as a historical estimate. It was prepared under earlier reporting practice and has not been verified and classified as a current mineral resource under present Canadian standards. It is a guide for targeting drilling, not a statement of currently defined resources.

What is the next milestone for the project?

The assay results from the current drilling programme. Those will show whether the broad skarn intervals actually carry tungsten at grades comparable to the historical holes of 13.0 metres at 0.55% WO₃ and 11.3 metres at 0.59% WO₃, how continuous mineralisation is between the modelled lenses, and whether molybdenum appears at meaningful levels.

Sources

Photo: Ahmed Sadeq · Pexels Licence — source

Filed under Battery Metals

More on Battery Metals

See all →